Re: "Devil May Cry Trademark Renewed"

Took long enough for me to do a blog about a game ;)

So, this is actually concerning the recent video posted by Miles923 or Maximillian Dood, who mentioned that there’s hope yet in Capcom still having interest in their Devil May Cry series. You can watch the video here, if you'd like, then read on.

After the response the Ninja Theory reboot got, it’s likely that they’ll go back to the Dante that fans knew and loved even during the reboot’s existence. But before I get into some of the questions he asked in his video, I’d like to share what I thought of the reboot, something I should’ve done a long time ago.

Now, as a game, the reboot was and still is good to play. On an artistically and audible level, it was a welcome addition to the series, which complimented each other every step of the way. There were some gripes I had about the controls, but I got through it enough to make sure that it wasn’t the only thing making me dislike it.

On the narrative level, some of the dialogue, particularly the more vulgar moments Dante had, was like listening to most children curse when there aren’t any adults around. Don’t get me wrong, there were subtle moments of it, and nods to sexual content in the previous games, but in here, it seemed more forced, trying to make Dante (if not others) “cool” and “edgier” in a sense that would make audience members that are into those features somehow satisfied, if not draw a new audience in. Instead, it came off as adolescent and almost amateurish, particularly to anyone that was into the original series, because it didn’t need all that to exist. If anything, the retelling of the story had the makings of what could’ve happened if the series were to be turned into a live-action movie by now, something that the writer to the reboot has some previous experience in.   

That, I felt is a shame because for the most part, the series did need a reboot in some form, especially once they added Nero into the mix.  Not talking trash about Nero, and the gameplay changeup he added to it, but on a story level, the ambiguity behind his link to the Sparda bloodline could’ve been added into the reboot universe, as well opened up the chance for some alternate takes to classic characters to reappear, like Lady, Arkham, Trish, even those from the poorly received Devil May Cry 2, namely Arius and Lucia.  

Now, as far as what would be best for Capcom to do since renewing the trademark? Despite fan/consumer relations, their best move would be to have the original Dante return, but in doing so, take some nods that made the NT reboot playable, and the parts from the 3rd and 4th game memorable and the most popular. This would have to be, of course, done by ignoring those that still haven’t or never will given the reboot a chance because of simpler complaints, such as Dante’s overall new look. 

Now long before the reboot, I remember some wondering what else can the series do that’ll keep it profitable for Capcom, and keep it interesting for both them and the consumers. I’d believe they’re better off not worrying about complete revivals, and just keep the elder franchise going, while adding the new play elements to Dante, or whomever they make the lead.

While taking risks is part of any business, now’s the time to look into the hits and misses, especially with Capcom’s current financial issues. Dante is a character that many would agree deserves more than guest appearances, and let’s face the fact that in the world he’s from, they could have some far-fetched reason characters like Mundus, Vergil/Nelo Angelo, and other villains make some twisted comeback, should there be some demand for it. Though I see more of that towards Vergil, due to his popularity from DMC 3, and further solidified in Ultimate MvC 3.

You could even go as far as have some game somehow combine the two worlds, like a Sonic Generations kind of style, but that’d be asking for too much at once, especially when the reboot controls has a bit more complexity than the other DMC titles, but there can still be a balance brought to make something like that doable, to the dismay of the anti-reboot crowd.           

As for Ninja Theory? Well I could say that it’d be fine to see them have another chance at DMC, but their control over it would have to be severely limited, at least in the sense of there being a new writer that can capture the original charm the series had, even to his first venture to his younger days in DMC 3. While the controls were bothersome at times, a sequel is a chance to polish those issues up so that more people can get into the game, and for the more forgiving critics to give it a second chance. Definitely make it as fair and balanced as the difficulty was in part three, four, and to a point the reboot, and get the artists from both Capcom and Ninja Theory (should any of them still work for the companies by this point) to join forces.

Though personally, if they were to top the Bob Barbas fight, I would be shocked and impressed. 

However, if Ninja Theory were to work with Capcom once more, but not on a DMC title, then give them a new IP, something to prove that they’re capable of being entertaining, without all the risk brought on from having them helm the reboot. Capcom’s had a bad reputation cutting ties with developers well before their time, and in this case it’s the same, except at least it’s not before they could finish a trilogy, or even start one. 

So all that's left now is to see what comes of the TM renewal. Just so long as they don't lose interest in this high-interest product as they've done before, there's hope in Capcom winning back the good graces of some of their fanbase, if not all. 

[End Scene]

"And in this corner...WTF!?" Follow-up.

The price of being gullible weighs on many of us, but for those that aren't afraid to speak out on their faults for believing a parody story, I salute you, and you're not alone in it.

So it did turn out that the whole fight was a hoax from the start, which even with that, I couldn't help but wonder if it's due to the backlash and protests its then-existence had. To say that it doesn't exist can seem like an escape hatch, much like how public figures have to apologize for something that doesn't require an apology, especially when they were originally speaking their mind. That's something I'll speak on another time, but for now, this.

As for me believing in it, I've little to no regrets. It was on me to outright believe that something like this would've happened, despite feeling that society would be this low as to eat this up. Besides, if Zimmerman won, there'd be outrage, dark(er) humor, DMX's street cred (arguably) lowered, and maybe a Grand Wizard somewhere naming a lynching rope after George. But if DMX won, there'd be various shouts and whispers about justice (in its alternate forms) finally being served from many, while certain others may..no, WILL give him the Richard Sherman treatment.    

So as far as a society goes, once again I'm reminded of, of all things, a movie tagline:

"Whoever wins, we lose."

And I say that we lose because, it's already bad enough that there's been another racial divide brought on by Zimmerman's case. Now look who's about to fight him? You have someone who's rhymed about, cinematically portrayed, and in some people's eyes, is the type of person Zimmerman thought an innocent slain child fit the description of. Add that onto the ignorance to general public who feel it's easier to hate an entire race because a number of people suddenly represent millions of others, many of them could give a damn about those that are shuckin' and jivin', wearing their pants half off their ass, and other signs of falling from grace, and what do you have? Satisfying the status quo, brought to you by a grant from the Power Elite.  
So yeah, I'm glad that it's not happening, ecstatic even. I should've been wiser though to see if the fight was truly going on, but if it served any positive purpose, it's that there's people out there that also bought into it, and wanted no part in a society that would've allowed this to happen.

Maybe in time, we'll all come together and do the same for something actually worth worrying about. So long as that doesn't prove to be a hoax, either.


[End Scene]  

And in this corner...WTF!?

(NOTE: Sometimes, I do my best to avoid potentially controversial topics, but I felt okay enough to speak out on this one. If for no other reason, because insomnia's a foul beast.)


Like many, I'm disgusted  by the very existence of George Zimmerman (yes, the love child of the NRA and the questionable Florida justice system), and his recent proposal to face someone in "celebrity" boxing. I could go on about the trial, its results, how it makes me feel in many ways, but I've said enough to that in other areas. On a lesser matter, I could even harp about why I put the word celebrity in quotes (which I kinda' do, later). But I think it goes without saying that for someone to have taken a young man's life to consider themselves a noteworthy figure says a lot about 1) the person's warped sense of reality, and 2) the warping of said reality by those that support him.

It should also go without saying that there was a long list of applicants (15 K+, to be exact) that wished to damage him (or worse) for the reason his name's relevant/mud to many, applicant or not. Even when I first heard about the story, something else came to mind along with my disgust, that being the question "Does it have to be a celebrity to fight him?" The amount of people that would love their chance, regardless of their social status in any scope, could fill a small country, but in the end,  one was chosen...

Rapper/Actor/"Father of the Year", DMX.

So I'm a little at odds about this. It's allegedly for charity on X's case, okay, good. Charity is good at any situation. But when you say things like this...

"I am going to break every rule in boxing to make sure I **** him up. Once I am done, I am going to whip my **** out and piss on him. Zimmerman is a piece of **** and that is what he needs to drink." 

...all you better do is win. I don't care how, so long as you also don't take more than you give to said charity (which, if you're a complete jerk, it might be understood if he does), but there's a lot riding on this. There's the undeniable racial tension written all over Zimmerman's miasma even outside of fight night, and because of that, others have expressed their own brand of justice (however so sloppily).

While DMX hasn't gone as far as his opponent has, both of them (more George, anyway) make me think about the movie Natural Born Killers, which eventually speaks up in a satirical fashion how much notorious people in the news become twisted superstars, with people wanting to be (with) them because their own lives lack the energy and unhealthy exposure. But we are in a world where non-celebrities in lockup are able to "hook up with local singles," so I guess things like this are the next step.

So it really comes down to whether or not I'll watch it. I want to comfortably say "no," but I'd be damned if I'm not interested in at least the results, but it may come down to if it's available for me.

Look, I'm not gonna' sit here and say that I don't want X to do what he says he'll do (however comical it'll be if he does give him a phallic hose down), but it doesn't really matter who's in the ring. Both of them have blood and dirt on their hands, but for the interested, it's coming down to whose crime(s) is/are the most reprehensible (and defenses can be done for both, sadly).  

In the end, I doubt something like this is worth any major or cable network's time, so until I'm proven wrong, let's just guess this'll be online and be done with it. Maybe while it's on, I'll watch Killers in some strange sense of protest.

And because of the lead-up to (SPOILER WARNING!!) this scene.


     
[End Scene]